grr.Just blogging to get this out of my system.
I've a new student today, and her mum totally managed to get on the wrong side of me. In fact, she brought my blood to a rolling boil by just having to complain and comment about every single detail and aspect of my teaching. More than half of what she said was wrong, though.
She complained about the room I was using being so open. (
SO? It's glass walled. What'd you wanna me to do? Paint them over?)
She complained about the room being stuffy. (
SO?? Ok ok, it's usually the case when I just switch on the aircon.)
She complained about the stool her daughter was using being too low. (
WRONG - it was just nice.)
With reference to point above, she said that 'that's why must have adjustable stool'. Like we are so very deficient because we don't have one. (
WRONG, bitch - there is a margin of error for stool/chair height. Anyway drum stools aren't suitable for cellists.)
As I was about to start, she said she wanted to look at the Synwin half-size cello. (
WRONG MOVE - this is a taboo because a few weeks earlier, during the trial class, I had already expressed my strong stance AGAINST her getting a half-size instrument.)
She seemed to make a big deal of the fact that the lady boss had told her over the phone that Synwin instruments were somewhat better than Eurostring ones, but told her otherwise today, and that she said there was a Synwin 1/2 size cello in school, but when we took it out, it was actually a Eurostring. (
SO??? Is any of this actually important?)
I got into a slight argument with her because she was quite insistent on getting a half-size instrument for the daughter, on the grounds that she wouldn't have to buy so many instruments since 'they grow out of them really fast'. (
WRONG AND STUPID!!!)
As I was starting, she commented that 'cello uses bass clef right? At first I thought don't bother with cello because it uses alto clef.' (Act smart -
FAIL.)
When I was teaching, she played surrogate teacher and tried to tell me what to do. (
WRONG MOVE - are you the teacher or am I the teacher, bitch?)
Near the end of the lesson, she said that I should give an extra 5-10 minutes because we started late and 'it's not our fault'. I replied 'it's not my fault either'. (
WRONG AND STUPID - it IS your fault for wasting time about the 1/2 size cello, retard.)
I promise I will kick her most unceremoniously out of the class next Sunday.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Matthew 4:3-4The tempter came to him and said, "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become BreadTalk." Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on BreadTalk alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'"The Dangers of OveranalysisThis is also known as 'reading too far between the lines', 'seeing ghosts where there are none', and, in the field of music, 'giving the composer too much credit'.
One prime example is Elgar's
Enigma Variations. I'm convinced that the name is just a nice name, but that doesn't stop musicologists from analyzing it and trying to find an actual enigma inside. So far they have not found any. My opinion is that the name is similar to Heinrich Biber's
Mystery Sonatas. Why aren't people poking it to find out what the mystery is?
When it comes to such connotations especially religious ones, some observations are just. Spot on, in fact. For example C.S. Lewis's
Narnia series has strong biblical allusions. The second and last book, in particular.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe famously alludes to the crucifixion itself, and
The Last Battle is an exploration of the End Days when Jesus returns. Quite widely written, this topic is.
Some might be stretching it a bit, for example Judas Priest's
Painkiller contains a very perverse allusion to Jesus. Or does it, really?
And when such analyses go too far? Does any of you remember a children's song called
Two Little Dicky Birds?Two little dicky birdsSitting on the wallOne named PeterThe other named PaulFly away PeterFly away PaulCome back PeterCome back PaulUnbeknownst to many, this song is actually a veiled biblical reference. The two birds allude to, of course, the apostles by the same names. They are birds because it symbolizes their ability to travel (to spread the gospel), and the part about them flying away alludes to just that: spreading the gospel. The part about them coming back is, of course, when they return to Heaven to be by God's side.
This analysis is unbeknownst to many because it isn't even true in the first place. It's created by yours truly, to illustrate how we sometimes see ghosts when there are none to begin with. Maybe someone will catch wind of this and rumours will spread, and primary school teachers will be forced to take it out of the syllabus entirely.
Isn't the world wonderful?
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Jesus hanged from a tree? OMGWTF?Don't know what I'm talking about? Check this out.
Acts 5:30 (NIV)'The God of our fathers raised Jesus from the dead - whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree.'
I mean, huh?
I re-read that passage a few times, then freaked out and smsed Elim about the verse. That was about 4.30 in the morning.
I thought it was perhaps a figurative usage, as in 'You should just go and hang yourself' or something. Elim's reply was
'The cross is made of wood, which comes from the tree!'
Lol.
Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.comGet awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com